Showing posts with label interview. Show all posts
Showing posts with label interview. Show all posts

Sunday, June 14, 2015

Marketing yourself

Original post:  Feb 27, 2014

Tomorrow, I am scheduled to volunteer at an event in Lowell. I will be joining a number of other company veterans at the event. We will address a group of other veterans who are just beginning their transition to civilian work life.

One of the hardest things to learn coming out of the military was the concept of self-promotion. Much of military life involves team activities. The team matters far more than the individual. Each person is expected to do their job so that the entire group can advance. In civilian life, there are many times when you will also have to work on a team. In order to get to that point, though, you first have to be hired! Job interviews are really about trying to position yourself as a key contributor (as opposed to just another team member).

This article from Inc. gives one person's opinion. It says that you should never describe yourself using the ten terms provided in the article. To be honest, I don't agree fully with each of them. That said, there are legitimate points raised about trying to stay away from the obvious and succinctly making your case for why you should be hired. There is a fine line between effective self-promotion and just being a bit full of yourself.

Here are some of my favorites from the article:

"Motivated."
Check out Chris Rock's response (not safe for work or the politically correct) to people who say they take care of their kids. Then substitute the word "motivated." Never take credit for things you are supposed to do--or be.
"Authority."
If you have to say you're an authority, you aren't. Show your expertise instead. "Presenter at SXSW" or "Delivered TED Talk at Long Beach 2010" indicates a level of authority. Unless you can prove it, "social media marketing authority" just means you spend a ton of time on Twitter.
"Innovative."
Most companies claim to be innovative. Most people claim to be innovative. Most are not. (I'm not.) That's okay, because innovation isn't a requirement for success.
If you are innovative, don't say it. Prove it. Describe the products you've developed. Describe the processes you've modified. Give us something real so your innovation is unspoken but evident... which is always the best kind of evident to be.
"Creative."
See particular words often enough and they no longer make an impact. "Creative" is one of them. (Go to LinkedIn and check out some profiles; "creative" will appear in the majority.)
"Creative" is just one example. Others include extensive, effective, proven, dynamic, influential, team player, collaborative... some of those terms truly may describe you, but since they're also being used to describe everyone else they've lost their impact.

Here is the link to the full article:  10 Ways You Should Never Describe Yourself | Inc.com

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Google admits failure

Original post:  Jul 10, 2013

A few years ago, Google was celebrated for pioneering a new tactic with their prospective candidates. During the interview process, they would pose some insanely difficult question like some of the samples below:

  • How much should you charge to wash all the windows in Seattle?
  • How many times a day does a clock's hands overlap?
  • Explain a database in three sentences to your eight-year-old nephew


The basic idea was that the pressure of the interview revealed the thought process of individual candidates and how they might come to a creative solution.

It turns out that those assumptions were not true. In a recent interview with the NY Times, Laszlo Bock,

Google's senior VP of people operations admitted:

“We found that brainteasers are a complete waste of time,” he said. “How many golf balls can you fit into an airplane? How many gas stations in Manhattan? A complete waste of time. They don’t predict anything. They serve primarily to make the interviewer feel smart.”

What does work?

Bock explained that the company is finding greater success with structured, behavioral interviews that offer some consistency in regards to how candidates are assessed. 
“Behavioral interviewing also works – where you’re not giving someone a hypothetical, but you’re starting with a question like, ‘Give me an example of a time when you solved an analytically difficult problem,’” he added.

“The interesting thing about the behavioral interview is that when you ask somebody to speak to their own experience, and you drill into that, you get two kinds of information. One is you get to see how they actually interacted in a real-world situation, and the valuable ‘meta’ information you get about the candidate is a sense of what they consider to be difficult.”

Here are the links to some supporting articles: